He was responsible for all external relationships of PayPal.”. “In 1998, Hoffman joined PayPal as a member of the Board of Directors at the founding of the company and became Executive Vice President from 2000 – 2002. Pierre Omidyar, founder of The Intercept & billionaire financier & philanthroper, served as Reid Hoffman’s boss while Hoffman was EVP at Paypal. Apparently, the anti-Trump sentiment is enough to cross party lines for Reid’s wallet. He’s donated to conservative Democrats like Abby Spanberger & Tim Kaine, Congressional Progressive Caucus members like Katie Porter & Mike Levin, but also suspiciously a $2900 maxed-out donation to Liz Cheney for Congress - on Febru. So far in 2022, Hoffman has been donating across the political spectrum of Congress. 10,000 Hours with Reid Hoffman: What I Learned by Ben Casnocha He wants to use his talent and network and money to change the world for the better and solve some of humanity’s biggest problems.” “I wake up in the morning unsure of whether I want to savor the world or save the world,” White said, “This makes it hard to plan the day.”’ … “ what he really wants to do is save. Often, Reid wrestled with these tradeoffs. When Reid chose to fly to Las Vegas and speak at this event, the list of things he chose not to do with that time was very, very long. ‘A small number of humans have virtually no constraints on their decision-making, and Reid is one of them. This in-depth interview with Hoffman in 2012 reveals how his enormous wealth helped him grow a savior complex. The People’s House Project was funded directly through Reid Hoffman, a notorious Russiagater, anti-Trumper and former member of board of directors at PayPal. She has never explained what happened there, or why only 3% of the money raised went to actual candidates running for office. We showed, from FEC filings, how the PAC was used quite literally to fund her own salary. In the last article, we discussed briefly about Krystal’s scam of a PAC, the People’s House Project. Viewers need to keep this in mind when watching, to determine for themselves how biased a segment may be towards a certain perspective and why the hosts are supporting or arguing against it. direct action, mutual aid, pulling support & funding for Democratic candidates in favor of independents & 3rd parties) - which results in shepherding people back toward the Democrats, a corporate-controlled entity where citizens have little influence over policy. Krystal may rail against the Democrats’ corruption, but offers no alternative solutions (i.e. It’s not terribly surprising to find Saagar and Marshall’s foreign policy positions, which align with the neo-conservative think tanks funding them, seeping into the Breaking Points coverage. Krystal and Saagar position the show as user-funded and “independent,” but that’s not exactly true - when much of the source of the hosts’ wealth & income (which helped or helps fund the show) comes directly from orgs connected to either the Military Industrial Complex or billionaires trying to buy the neo-liberal political landscape who partner with other billionaires’ philanthropic tax write-offs to finance “independent” media.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |